Analysts: Abu Ubaidah's speech is a response to Netanyahu's tactics, these are the most prominent implications of his policies

Political and military analysts and experts believe that Abu Ubaidah's speech was a spokesman Qassam Brigades – The military wing of the Islamic Resistance Movement (agitationThis is a response to the Israeli Prime Minister's trickery Benjamin NetanyahuThey confirm that it carries information and influence on the ground, politics and negotiations.

Major General Fayez al-Duwairi, a military and strategic expert, said Abu Ubaidah's speech reflected the reality of the battlefield and the willingness, determination and execution capabilities to deal with the situation. Occupation forces There were also mercenaries, which resulted in them being killed, injured or escaping.

In an interview with the program “Gaza … What's next?”, Duwairi explained that the reconstruction of the Qassam Brigades, the thousands of fighters recruited during the war and the waiting for other fighters confirmed that the numbers of the Qassam Brigades are similar to those before October 7 last year.

He noted that rebuilding the brigades at the human and material level meant they became highly combat-capable, citing the Third Campaign as an example. Shujaiya Neighborhood Eastern part of the city Gaza, The resistance fared better than in the previous two battles.

Regarding the impact of this term on the negotiation process, Duvali pointed out that the advantage on the battlefield determines the terms of negotiations, especially in the case of asymmetric warfare.

He concluded that rebuilding the brigades and restoring their capabilities in both human and material terms, while continuing military industrialization through the use of recycled and dismantled war remnants and the acquisition of explosives, confirmed Israel’s failure to achieve its war objectives.

Response to Netanyahu

In turn, writer and political researcher Sari Orabi believes that the appearance of Abu Ubaida is itself an event after a full nine months of war and the transformation of its course, adding that he is considered one of the symbols of this war around which supporters of the resistance rally in Palestine and in the Arab and Islamic world.

He pointed out that his presence had battlefield and military significance, such as Qassam's emphasis on renewing its manpower and defense capabilities, recovering some of what was lost, recycling the remnants of the war, and recruiting thousands of people as support forces in light of the occupation's claims to disband the Qassam Brigades in the Gaza Strip.

Orabi said command and control, organizational communication and the command and control room remained effective, as evidenced by the emergence of Abu Ubaidah.

It also clarifies that the emergence of Abu Ubaidah is consistent with Hamas's performance in negotiations and changes within Israeli society and its institutions, thanks to the performance and firmness of the local resistance in Gaza, as well as the performance of the media, especially the Israeli media, of the Qassam Brigades and their spokespersons.

Letter on Abu Ubaidah's Speech IsraelOrabi drew attention to the fact that the Qassam spokesman mentioned Netanyahu and claimed that he was manipulating everyone in Israel and putting his personal interests above those of the detained prisoners.

He added that Hamas knows Netanyahu well enough to know that he is buying time and wants to create confusion and ambiguity, so “Abu Ubaidah's speech is a response to Netanyahu's tricks.”

Netanyahu's policies

Muhannad Mustafa, a scholar and expert on Israeli affairs, believes that Abu Ubaidah's speech was made in the context of discussions on ceasefire proposals, which include the basic determinant that the idea of ​​​​eliminating Hamas is unattainable and that it has survived even despite all the military actions taken by Israel.

According to Mustafa, Abu Ubaida’s speech also asserted that Netanyahu is manipulating prisoner files and is not serious about addressing the issue because it does not matter to him, adding that this is understood by all Israelis.

He noted that it was “expected” that Netanyahu's comments gave the other side of the negotiations the impression that Israel would not stop the war, which he attributed to the fact that he pursues a policy of creating obstacles to reaching an agreement and that he has a strategic goal of not stopping the war in order to remain in power.

Mustafa pointed out that the protests in Israel have reached the stage where an agreement must be reached to end the war, but Netanyahu does not want this and instead seeks disruption and blames Hamas for the failure of the negotiations.

He concluded that Netanyahu wants to buy time to meet the demands of various sectors of Israeli society, adding that “Netanyahu will not change his position if protests in Israel do not escalate into a kind of civil disobedience.”

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button